DOKADS / Issue 001

The big
questions.

Who, what, where, and why — the long versions. Plus everything we are working on writing next.

none of this is homework

Fig. 01 — Who is a DoKAD? Artwork is generated, not photographic; we are waiting on the community for real images.

Section 01. Who is a DoKAD?

Who

A DoKAD is a descendant of a Korean adoptee — most often the child of someone adopted from Korea, sometimes the grandchild or great-grandchild.

That is how we use the term here. The word is new and still settling, and not everyone draws the line in the same place — but on this site it does not require speaking Korean, having visited Korea, being read as Korean, or knowing anything about your family’s history before the adoption. Plenty of DoKADs are mixed race. Plenty grew up in towns where nobody else looked like them, and plenty grew up somewhere it was never remarked on at all.

It also does not require having a settled relationship with any of it. People arrive here curious, angry, indifferent, homesick for a place they have never been, or just looking for someone with the same weird set of facts. All of that counts.

  • Second generation and beyond
  • Any racial background
  • Any level of Korean connection
  • Adopted parent, adopted grandparent, or further back

Fig. 02 — What is Korean adoption? Artwork is generated, not photographic; we are waiting on the community for real images.

Section 02. What is Korean adoption?

What

From the 1950s onward, roughly 200,000 children were adopted out of South Korea — the largest and longest-running international adoption programme in the world. Most went to families in the United States, and many to Western Europe and Australia.

The reasons shifted decade to decade: war and its aftermath, poverty, the treatment of mixed-race children, the stigma attached to unmarried mothers, and a set of policies and agencies that made sending children abroad the path of least resistance. Korea has since tightened its adoption laws considerably, and adoptees themselves drove much of that change.

What matters for this site is the part that comes next. The earlier generations of Korean adoptees are adults now. Many are parents, and some are grandparents. The questions did not end with them — they moved.

  • Began in the 1950s
  • Largest programme of its kind
  • Mostly to the US and Europe
  • Many adoptees are parents now

Fig. 03 — Where are we? Artwork is generated, not photographic; we are waiting on the community for real images.

Section 03. Where are we?

Where

Korean adoptees were placed across the United States, Scandinavia, Western Europe, Canada, and Australia — which means their descendants are scattered the same way. A DoKAD in Copenhagen and a DoKAD in Minneapolis often have more in common with each other than with anyone in their own postcode.

There is also a steady flow in the other direction. Adoptees have returned to Korea to live, work, search, and organise, and some DoKADs have grown up partly there.

Geography is one of the harder parts of this community. We are small numbers spread very thin. That is most of why this exists online.

  • United States
  • Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Netherlands
  • France, Belgium, Germany
  • Australia · Canada · and back in Korea

Fig. 04 — Why does this matter? Artwork is generated, not photographic; we are waiting on the community for real images.

Section 04. Why does this matter?

Why

For some DoKADs, growing up means holding a story they did not live through and may not be able to verify. The family tree has a hard stop. The medical history is blank. Someone at school assigns a heritage project and it lands badly, and there is no good short answer to give the teacher.

Some carry visible Korean ancestry without the cultural inheritance that people expect to come with it. Some carry none of the visibility and all of the connection. Some are close to a parent who does not want to talk about it, and some are close to a parent who cannot stop.

None of that is a crisis and none of it needs fixing. But it is real, and it is much easier in company than alone. That is the entire premise of DOKADS.

  • Inherited, half-answered histories
  • Race without cultural inheritance
  • Family trees with a hard stop
  • Nobody at school gets it
The questions did not end with the first generation. They moved.
The premise of this whole thing

Section 05. What we are writing next

An open editorial queue. If something here matters to you, tell us — the order is not fixed, and we would rather write what people actually need.

Start with the basics

Family + conversations

  • What descendants may want to know about family history

    Planned

    The questions that come up most, and which ones have findable answers.

Identity + race

Korea

  • The F-4 route written for children and grandchildren, what citizenship restoration would really cost, and the government programmes that name adoptees’ children explicitly.

    Held back on purpose. This is educational information, not legal advice. Immigration and citizenship rules change, and eligibility is never determined by a family relationship alone. Check official sources and, where it matters, talk to a qualified professional.

Practical + preservation

Building community

  • Starting a local DoKAD gathering

    Planned

    What worked in Minnesota, written so it can be copied anywhere.

  • How Korean adoptees and their descendants can support one another

    Planned

    Two overlapping communities with different needs.

  • Community-led research about descendants of adoptees

    Planned

    What we would want studied, and who should be asking the questions.

Section 06. How we handle legal + immigration content

People ask about Korean citizenship, the F-4 visa, and residency more than almost anything else. It is also the easiest thing to get badly wrong, so anything we publish on it has to clear all five of these before it goes up.

  1. Reviewed for current accuracy before publication
  2. Shows the date it was last reviewed
  3. Cites official sources
  4. Carries a disclaimer that it is educational information, not legal advice
  5. Never promises eligibility based only on a family relationship

This is educational information, not legal advice. Immigration and citizenship rules change, and eligibility is never determined by a family relationship alone. Check official sources and, where it matters, talk to a qualified professional.

Something missing?

Tell us what you came here looking for and could not find. That is genuinely how this queue gets ordered.